<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Norman Taylor &#38; Associates - California Lemon Law &#187; warranty protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/tag/warranty-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog</link>
	<description>Call 877-SOURCAR (768-7227) for Any Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Lemon Law- June Car Sales: A Lesson for Chrysler?</title>
		<link>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-laws-june-car-sales-%e2%80%93-a-lesson-for-chrysler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-laws-june-car-sales-%e2%80%93-a-lesson-for-chrysler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norman Taylor and Associates</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Lemon Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warranties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Lemon Law Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranty protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last few months have been quite eventful for California Lemon Law advocates and consumers alike. The downward trend in sales, bailouts and bankruptcy proceedings were contributing factors. The June sales figures are in and while the news isn’t good, there are signs that the market is beginning to stabilize. Of the automakers with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last few months have been quite eventful for <a href="http://www.normantaylor.com/">California Lemon Law advocates</a> and consumers alike. The downward trend in sales, bailouts and bankruptcy proceedings were contributing factors. The June sales figures are in and while the news isn’t good, there are signs that the market is beginning to stabilize. Of the automakers with a major presence in the U.S.,  Ford showed the best results with sales dropping only 10.7% compared to last June and reporting a gain in market share. Overall, the drop in sales reported by all manufacturers was 27.7% &#8211; almost exactly the same as Toyota. General Motors and Honda were worse than average at 33 and 30 percent respectively. The big loser was Chrysler whose sales plummeted a whopping 42 percent.</p>
<p>Most analysts figured that the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies would hurt their sales and it appears that the experts were right. Ford, on the other hand, seems to have won a lot of consumer confidence by refusing government bailouts and remaining self-sufficient.</p>
<p>Chrysler fared much worse than GM, at least on a one-month basis and a good question is why the difference? There is probably not a single answer. One reason might be in how the two manufacturers have dealt with warranty matters (i.e. demands for buybacks under the <a href="http://www.normantaylor.com">California lemon law</a> and other state lemon laws) while under bankruptcy court protection. Early in the process, GM got court approval to continue to honor warranty claims as it always had. Chrysler, on the other hand, created a lot of ill will and bad publicity by bouncing settlement checks. It has tried to use the bankruptcy to change the terms of settlements previously agreed to. Did the public conclude that Chrysler was using the bankruptcy to hide from its responsibilities? Hard to tell for sure, but one thing is certain.   Your rights to warranty protection are an essential part of car ownership. When these are threatened, you should request legal assistance and consider taking your future business elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-laws-june-car-sales-%e2%80%93-a-lesson-for-chrysler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Lemon Law, Lemon Cars and Cash for Guzzlers</title>
		<link>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-law-lemon-cars-and-cash-for-guzzlers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-law-lemon-cars-and-cash-for-guzzlers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norman Taylor and Associates</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Lemon Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying a new car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Allowance Rebate System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranty protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress has just passed a bill that would give consumers cash vouchers between $3,500 and $4,500 in exchange for trading in their existing gas guzzlers for newer, more fuel-efficient vehicles. The bill does not specifically mention your rights under the California lemon law or federal lemon laws, but your protection as a consumer is something [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress has just passed a bill that would give consumers cash vouchers between $3,500 and $4,500 in exchange for trading in their existing gas guzzlers for newer, more fuel-efficient vehicles. The bill does not specifically mention your rights under the <a href="http://www.normantaylor.com/lemonlaw.html">California lemon law</a> or federal lemon laws, but your protection as a consumer is something you should always consider when buying a new car. You never know if it will turn out to be a fuel efficient lemon car.</p>
<p>The idea behind the gas guzzlers law, which President Obama is expected to sign,  is a simple one. Cars with poor gas mileage will be gotten off the road while at the same time stimulating flagging car sales. There is a lot of skepticism as to whether the idea will work and critics in Congress scaled back the duration of the program from a year to four months.</p>
<p>The government has put up a web site where you can learn if you qualify. The Car Allowance Rebate System can be found at www.cars.gov. Should you decide to take advantage of the program you should fully check out the warranty protection of your new car to see if it will meet your needs and to determine what protection you will have if the car is defective.</p>
<p>Remember: just because a car is a fuel-sipper doesn’t mean it can’t be a lemon car. The California lemon law and federal lemon laws don&#8217;t take fuel economy into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normantaylor.com/blog/lemon-law/california-lemon-law-lemon-cars-and-cash-for-guzzlers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
