• Home
  • About Us
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Lemon Law
  • Testimonials
  • Blogs
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Email us for a case evaluation
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Lemon Law
  • Testimonials
  • Blogs
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Norman Taylor & Associates
818.244.3905
Free Initial Consultation 888.449.7639
clientservices@normantaylor.com
California Lemon Law Attorneys
Lemon Law
  • We Wrote the Book
    on Lemon Law

    Knowledge is power. Learn more about your rights and how the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act protects you!

    Download Your Free Copy
  • Serving Clients
    Since 1987

    We exist to demand justice from automobile companies and major corporations that refuse to abide by industry standards.

    Benefits of Choosing Us
  • Over 10,000
    Cases Handled

    With decades of experience, we have been able to demand more than $100 million in refunds and recoveries for our clients.

    View Our Testimonials
Blog 2008 September Superior Court Judge Upholds Largest "Lemon Law" Jury Verdict in California
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Superior Court Judge Upholds Largest "Lemon Law" Jury Verdict in California

Posted By Norman Taylor & Associates || 30-Sep-2008

On February 7, 1992, Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Patrick McMahon upheld an October jury verdict of $182,096.11 to Mr. Pierre P. Forest of Beverly Hills.

The jury had found that BMW of North America willfully violated California's ‘lemon law' by refusing to refund to the plaintiff his vehicle purchase price, according to Mr. Forest's counsel, the Glendale law firm of Taylor and Hodges.

The Superior Court Judge in his memorandum of decision denying BMW's motion for a new trial, characterized the jury as conservative but said "... 99,999 out of 100,000 juries hearing the same evidence would have reached the same result."

Although BMW argued at trial that the particular electrical system defect was "characteristic of the design", BMW's literature did not disclose any such problem. The honorable Judge McMahon stated "in this modern age, when a vehicle is defective, it is a rather hollow defense to tell the customer to "get a horse."

"Whenever a manufacturer tells a consumer to accept an equally defective replacement vehicle, the jury is likely to treat this as equivalent to two other time-honored but immortal responses namely ‘let them eat cake' or ‘the public be damned.' the award was an attempt to quantify in monetary terms the immoral character of BMW's own corporate policies...," according to Judge McMahon.

In sustaining the jury's award of a civil penalty in the amount of $90,238.64, Judge McMahon stated: "the evidence of willfulness was self-evident. Indeed BMW's fate was sealed when they insisted that there was nothing wrong with the "ultimate driving machine." BMW's posture at trial made "...the award of penal damages virtual certainty".

Judge McMahon explained the philosophy behind the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (lemon law):
". . . The manufacturer has ultimate control over products sold to California consumers. If the product is defective, the manufacturer can either decide not to release the product at all or to refund the purchaser's money..." the statute "...tends to encourage that vehicles sold to members of the unsuspecting public will have been adequately tested and designed. Furthermore, if the manufacturer filibusters, the statute provides a mechanism by which a conscientious jury can impose financial penalty as a deterrent..." to such tactics.

Other interesting items to be found in Judge McMahon's memorandum of decision are:
Defense counsel's "...strident insistence that BMW should have prevailed on all issues seems to be presented more for the enjoyment of his clients rather than to address what actually happened at trial."

"The key to America's greatness never was caveat emptor."

"...if the 'characteristic of the design, etc. Is in fact defective, then the car should never have been designed in that fashion. Stated otherwise, if all other cars of the same make, model and year are also lemons, the manufacturer is not entitled to immunity."

"...gauged in light of numerous cases dealing with punitive damages, an award of a statutory penalty amounting to slightly more than the amount of the statutory damages does not shock the conscience. Indeed it seems to reflect the jury's decision that the corporate policy which BMW pursued will not be countenanced as it is out of step with the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act."

Mr. Forest's trial attorney, A. Clifton Hodges, said that this award, thought to be the largest "lemon law" award in the state's history, obviously sends a strong message to BMW. "If other manufacturers can read the handwriting on the wall, it should also serve as a potent message to the entire automotive industry."

Categories: News

Share Post

How Can We Help You?

  • Breach of Warranty
  • Common Vehicle Defects
  • Ford Motor Company Stonewalling
  • Lemon Law Basics
  • Lemon Law FAQ
  • Lemon Law Myths
  • RV Motor Home Lemons
  • Used Car Lemons
  • What Qualifies As a Lemon?

Have You Purchased or Leased
a Problematic Vehicle?

Start Your Case with a Free Consultation

Send
  • Avvo Rating Excellent, Featured Attorney in Lemon Law
  • The State Bar of California seal
  • United States District Court, Central District of California seal
  • Norman Taylor & Associates
  • Lemon Law
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Norman Taylor & Associates

Toll-Free (888) 449-7639

Norman Taylor & Associates - California Lemon Law Attorneys
425 West Broadway, Suite 220, Glendale, CA 91204 View Map
Toll-Free (888) 449-7639
Local (818) 244-3905
Website: https://www.normantaylor.com
© 2019 All Rights Reserved.
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.