• Home
  • About Us
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Lemon Law
  • Testimonials
  • Blogs
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Email us for a case evaluation
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Lemon Law
  • Testimonials
  • Blogs
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Norman Taylor & Associates
818.244.3905
Free Initial Consultation 888.449.7639
clientservices@normantaylor.com
California Lemon Law Attorneys
Lemon Law
  • We Wrote the Book
    on Lemon Law

    Knowledge is power. Learn more about your rights and how the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act protects you!

    Download Your Free Copy
  • Serving Clients
    Since 1987

    We exist to demand justice from automobile companies and major corporations that refuse to abide by industry standards.

    Benefits of Choosing Us
  • Over 10,000
    Cases Handled

    With decades of experience, we have been able to demand more than $100 million in refunds and recoveries for our clients.

    View Our Testimonials
Blog 2009 September Another Defense Trick: Lack of Maintenance
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Another Defense Trick: Lack of Maintenance

Posted By Norman Taylor & Associates || 16-Sep-2009

How many of you keep track of the due dates on the maintenance required for your vehicle? I’m good with oil changes, but I don’t really keep good track of the special maintenance service. This could prove to be very costly in ways you might not imagine.

In a period of two weeks I have had two ladies contact me to review their prospective lemon law cases. They both had defects which they had reported with regularity to the servicing dealer. Both presumed that the dealer was performing the required maintenance on their vehicle, which had come as part of the purchase. As it turned out in both instances, the dealer failed to advise the client during their multiple warranty repair visits, that their vehicle was due for some sort of scheduled maintenance service. Later, after the lemon law claim became clear, the manufacturer blamed the client for failing to properly maintain the vehicle, which they maintained was the true source of the defect. There was enough plausibility that I had to decline both cases.

But it was disturbing to me that a client who had paid for maintenance as part of the purchase contract would have the duty to bring the maintenance schedule to the attention of the servicing dealer. Sure enough, in the warranty manual in each case, the duty lies squarely on the shoulders of the buyer. Nonetheless, what type of operation would neglect to point this out to a customer, especially with the idea of creating a repeat customer? I own a vehicle where maintenance came as part of the purchase price. My dealer keeps me informed always when my vehicle is due for maintenance. I don’t instruct them to perform it – although according to the manual it is my duty. My dealer wants my business, so he takes care of me. They bring to my attention anything that is due and it gets done.

In the two instances cited above, neither woman was informed they were due for maintenance, though it came as part of their purchase contract. Both told me they instructed the dealer to do whatever was necessary. Apparently this wasn’t good enough. But for the lack of maintenance, they both had legitimate lemon law claims. Failure to properly maintain a vehicle is a potential defense in a lemon law claim – if it relates to the defect about which the owner complained. Unfortunately for these two ladies, for lack of proper maintenance that related to their defects, I had to turn down their cases. Now they may be stuck with a vehicle that is plagued with a problem that will never get right, or will cost them countless visits until a technician is lucky enough to remedy the defect; probably after the warranty expires and she has to pay for the service.

Did the dealer see a lemon coming down the road? Is this why the dealer chose not to give the client the “heads up” that maintenance was due – because they knew they could blame the customer for lack of maintenance as a defense to the lemon law claim? Having practiced California lemon law for over 22 years, it would come as no surprise if this were true. Just when I think I’ve seen everything…

The moral of the story is, don’t rely on your dealer to keep you informed when maintenance is due on your vehicle – especially if you have already had the vehicle in for warranty repairs repeatedly. Don’t jeopardize your lemon law rights by giving the manufacturer ammunition to use against you by failing to adhere to your maintenance schedule.

Categories: Lemon Law

Share Post

How Can We Help You?

  • Breach of Warranty
  • Common Vehicle Defects
  • Ford Motor Company Stonewalling
  • Lemon Law Basics
  • Lemon Law FAQ
  • Lemon Law Myths
  • RV Motor Home Lemons
  • Used Car Lemons
  • What Qualifies As a Lemon?

Have You Purchased or Leased
a Problematic Vehicle?

Start Your Case with a Free Consultation

Send
  • Avvo Rating Excellent, Featured Attorney in Lemon Law
  • The State Bar of California seal
  • United States District Court, Central District of California seal
  • Norman Taylor & Associates
  • Lemon Law
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Norman Taylor & Associates

Toll-Free (888) 449-7639

Norman Taylor & Associates - California Lemon Law Attorneys
425 West Broadway, Suite 220, Glendale, CA 91204 View Map
Toll-Free (888) 449-7639
Local (818) 244-3905
Website: https://www.normantaylor.com
© 2019 All Rights Reserved.
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.